Mormon Coffee

It's forbidden, but it's good!

The official blog site of Mormonism Research Ministry

Friday, February 24, 2006

Fundamentalist Mormons and Big Love


The LDS Church is upset over the new HBO series, Big Love. The TV show, which premiers March 12th, is about a polygamous family living in suburban Salt Lake City. Bill Paxton plays Bill Hendrickson, the husband of three wives; the family is depicted as members of an LDS offshoot group.

The Mormon Church has arranged for "a carefully worded disclaimer at the start of each hour, stressing that plural marriage is strictly outlawed by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." Nevertheless, the Church is unhappy about the possible confusion the HBO series may cause among its viewers. As the Denver Post notes,
"The last thing the LDS hierarchy needs is a primetime series featuring a polygamist who considers himself a follower of church founder Joseph Smith."

But I have to hand it to the show's producers. The so-called Mormon fundamentalist groups (polygamists) do follow the teachings of Joseph Smith. I applaud the producers' commitment to tell it like it is in the face of what must be tremendous pressure from the LDS Church.

What I find really interesting about this whole "Mormons are not polygamists" thing is the irony of it.
"The church has rigorously distanced itself from these sects, stressing that these groups are not Mormons, that there is no such thing as 'Fundamentalist Mormonism,' that polygamy merits excommunication from the mainstream church… Even calling them offshoots is misleading, [Church spokesman Mike] Otterson says."

The Denver Post further notes:
"The divide between mainstream Mormons and those who consider themselves fundamentalists is considerable. Although the [LDS] church shuns the 'fundamentalist' term, many remaining polygamists, living in secrecy in ultrareligious sects in the West, describe themselves that way.

"The fundamentalists, [series co-creator Mark] Olsen has said, 'look at The Church of Latter-Day Saints as sellouts and apostates.'"

Does this ring a bell for anyone? Try on this rewritten statement for size:
The divide between Christianity and those who consider themselves LDS Christians is considerable. Although Christianity shuns the 'LDS Christian' term, many Mormons, living in the West, describe themselves that way.

The 'LDS Christians' look at modern day non-LDS Christians as sellouts and apostates.

Hmmm…

Another interesting thing is this. Speaking of the fundamentalists Mike Otterson said:
"They are illegal polygamist groups…"

As were the Mormons when they practiced polygamy in Illinois and the Utah Territory.
"…several [are] under investigation for child abuse..."

Let's not forget that Joseph Smith married a 14-year-old girl, Brigham Young a 15-year-old, and John D. Lee a 12- or 14-year-old girl that he later divorced so she could marry his son.

But I think we can settle the issue of whether fundamentalists are Mormons by an appeal to a criterion deemed valid by Latter-day Saints everywhere, including LDS Church President Gordon B. Hinckley. Using their reasoning, of course polygamous fundamentalist are Mormons—many of them have "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints" right in the name of their church!

Who can argue with that?

2 Comments:

  • At February 24, 2006 7:03 PM, Anonymous Renee said…

    I don't know why the LDS church is so upset with the FLDS church just because they still follow Joseph Smith's teachings on polygymy. After all, the way I see it, the only reason the LDS church changed their law about polygymy was because Utah would not be allowed into the Union if they continued to practice polygamy. So, the then prophet had a revelation that polygamy should no longer be practiced. Where did that leave all the women who were in polygamous marriages because they were told they could not get into heaven unless they consented to those marriages? The FLDS got around that sticky problem by refusing to go against Joseph Smith's original teaching.

    I applaud HBO for having the moxie to stand up to the LDS church, and for depicting the polygamus family as members of an LDS offshoot group and followers of Joseph Smith.

     
  • At January 02, 2007 2:11 AM, Blogger Eric said…

    The teachings of the FLDS Church are incongruent with the teachings of the LDS church. Taking upon themselves the name of a church that emphsizes their doctrine as false is illogical. All the many denominations of Christianity that are off-shoots to the Catholic church don't call themselves FCatholic, they took upon them a name that depicts why they wanted to be different from the original church, not how they're trying to remain part of a church that rejects their doctrine.

    Furthermore, the "only reason" the LDS church changed their law about polygamy is not to get into the Union. Polygamy has existed for hundreds of years under the direction of direct revelation from God to His prophet. There are times in the Bible when polygamy was rejected, and times when it was sanctioned. There are living prophets today, and Joseph Smith, as the first prophet of this dispensation, simply revealed the will of God by instituting and then withdrawing the practice of polygamy, according to the purposes the Lord had for his church.

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home